Linked by David Adams on Wed 16th Apr 2008 15:58 UTC, submitted by supergear
Thread beginning with comment 309900
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How are such exploits unique to proprietary software?
I would say the lesson learned here for anyone who still believes that proprietary software is safer due to the closed-code is: It doesn't matter - someone with the know-how and determination will still figure out how the software works and find exploits.
Thus, open source has the advantage that *more* people can evaluate the source and find such flaws prior to compilation rather than via low level debugger and disassembly.
Also, if someone wanted to fix this in a mission critical environment before an official patch is available, they would be able to. Something that is not so easy with proprietary closed-source software.
edit: fixed wrong word in my sentence
Edited 2008-04-16 18:12 UTC






Member since:
2007-03-14
You people had to learn the hard way...
Next time, avoid such proprietary garbage.
Edited 2008-04-16 17:12 UTC