Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Apr 2008 11:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 310287
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Trust me, we know the difference! My Linux can run circles around Vista on lower end hardware while performing much of the same feats that Vista supposedly requires such a hardware upgrade to be able to do...
Oh and did I mention that my Linux uses less space while providing me with more apps?
So ummm, yeah not a problem on our end...
Oh and did I mention that my Linux uses less space while providing me with more apps?
So ummm, yeah not a problem on our end...
Here's your cookie too, now run home and eat it.




Member since:
2005-08-07
[sigh...] I really didn't want to comment in this thread, since doing so means I'll lose the ability to mod people but I just had to respond to this...
"Vista is not linux, vista is not linux, vista is not linux".
Trust me, we know the difference! My Linux can run circles around Vista on lower end hardware while performing much of the same feats that Vista supposedly requires such a hardware upgrade to be able to do...
Oh and did I mention that my Linux uses less space while providing me with more apps?
So ummm, yeah not a problem on our end...
Wow! Really?? I hadn't really seen that trend, but that would be so cool...
Umm...dude? You just said... Oh wait I see what you did there. Funny how no one in this article was even talking about Linux, wet dreams or etc until you brought them up... Nice try OP...
Ummm... Linux may indeed be a work in progress but unlike Vista it's free--both in cost and in freedom.
Vista requires me to spend a minimum of $100 USD for an OEM copy (which may or may not actually be legitimate) and still not have all the 'wonderful' features Microsoft advertises Vista as having! No for that I've got to spend nearly three hundred dollars as well as having to do a total hardware replacement in order to get the same level performance I have now in either XP or Ubuntu...
As others have asked in this thread, what exactly is Vista actually doing that requires them to use so much resources? It can't be the basic day to day functioning of the OS, because others have managed to do all that at a fraction of the resources and look better while doing so!
On this at least we agree!
Why isn't some consumer body (or all of them really) standing up for the people they supposedly represent and demanding an answer to Vista?
Why hasn't some governing body complained about Microsoft's blatant and forced paid beta program?
Why has it suddenly become acceptable to make your customers pay for your broken OS with the claim it's a work in progress?
Inquiring minds would like to know!
--bornagainpenguin