Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Apr 2008 11:38 UTC
Windows When Vista was released, and the first reviews started to trickle in, it became apparent that Vista was a massive release - not only in terms of money spent on it by Microsoft and the amount of promotion, but also the operating system itself. It was huge, and it felt as such too. Despite what many have been saying the past year, Vista is, in fact, much more than just XP with a new theme. Basically every framework and feature has been rewritten, lots of new ones have been added, and, according to some, the process of modularisation has started with Vista (and Server 2008). It may come as no surprise that all these changes resulted in a whole boatload of bugs and breakage, which led many people to conclude that Vista was simply not as "done" as it should have been when released. Steve Ballmer confirmed these sentiments in a speech at Microsoft's Most Valuable Professionals conference in Seattle.
Thread beginning with comment 310314
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: meh
by jptros on Fri 18th Apr 2008 15:13 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: meh"
Member since:

Trust me, we know the difference! My Linux can run circles around Vista on lower end hardware while performing much of the same feats that Vista supposedly requires such a hardware upgrade to be able to do...

Oh and did I mention that my Linux uses less space while providing me with more apps?

So ummm, yeah not a problem on our end...

Here's your cookie too, now run home and eat it.

Reply Parent Score: -1