Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 19th Apr 2008 23:39 UTC, submitted by TheNerd
Thread beginning with comment 310557
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by primelight@live.com
by shapeshifter on Sun 20th Apr 2008 19:39
in reply to "RE: Comment by primelight@live.com"
RE[3]: Comment by primelight@live.com
by StephenBeDoper on Mon 21st Apr 2008 02:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by primelight@live.com"




Member since:
2006-01-26
Moron.
So, while the developers are working in all their spare time to bring Haiku to alpha quality - what exactly do you recommend that all the non-developer community members focus on? Shall we simply encourage everyone else to take all the hard work already completed and advertise that it's finished?
Perhaps you downloaded and used a non-official "Haiku" distribution that was loaded with old BeOS software that crashed regularly and was extremely unstable for you. And then you came here and claimed that Haiku is a POS and unstable.
Hint: I'm suggesting that your first impression of Haiku may not have been what the Haiku project intended, and instead you got a sub-par experience from a pre-alpha testing/development image rather than waiting for the Haiku project to release anything official themselves.
I'm using your point to help prove further why it's necessary to protect brand names and trademarks in this situation.