Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Apr 2008 12:52 UTC, submitted by Michael Larabel
Thread beginning with comment 310602
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What about everything that isn't linux?
by aesiamun on Sun 20th Apr 2008 20:34
in reply to "RE: What about everything that isn't linux?"
RE[3]: What about everything that isn't linux?
by sbergman27 on Sun 20th Apr 2008 20:43
in reply to "RE[2]: What about everything that isn't linux?"
Xorg is focusing on linux like it's the only OS using the software.
I lived through the Unix wars. So forgive me if I fail to weep over that. We've done *nothing* on this well known issue for 14 years. The last thing the POSIX world needs is to haggle for even more years over exactly the right way to do it. *BSD and Solaris need to get with the program or get left behind. Continued inaction is not an option.
Edited 2008-04-20 20:50 UTC
RE[3]: What about everything that isn't linux?
by siki_miki on Tue 22nd Apr 2008 13:31
in reply to "RE[2]: What about everything that isn't linux?"
Xorg isn't removing anything that would make BSD's or Solaris stop using it.
However, there are additions which make the graphical system more advanced in Linux. If others don't want to apply that strategy, it's their choice to continue with the old way of running X/DRI.
That said, I'm sure that eventually someone will pop up to implement or port kernel part of new DRI to BSD's and other systems. Maybe it's even better to wait util it becomes solid enough on Linux (also there is no need to have exact the same thing, e.g. nvidia and ATI have their own frameworks that easily plug in into the X).





Member since:
2005-07-24
I don't understand what you mean by "ignoring them". If Solaris and *BSD want to benefit, their kernel people need to supply the capability. Xorg cannot do it for them. Fedora cannot do it for them.
Perhaps the FreeBSD kernel guys can take some time out from running and rerunning sysbench benchmarks long enough to implement this useful functionality. ;-)
Edited 2008-04-20 20:40 UTC