Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Apr 2008 11:19 UTC, submitted by Francis Kuntz
Thread beginning with comment 311052
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-01-23
Now they buy this company? Does that mean Apple is gonna play catchup?
It doesn't work well on my PowerPC-based machine but it's hardly crippled. Apple have already made their application software incompatible with PowerPC-based machines, so they're not thinking of computers, per se.
They point is that the company is designing processors. They've got some good ideas and certainly made some progress in efficiency in what was already an efficient design.
If Apple can use them to design their own portable device processors, they won't be stuck with Intel, Broadcom, or Samsung or any other company supplying the general market. That said, they shouldn't be stupid enough to make things proprietary and work themselves out of flexibility.