Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Apr 2008 21:12 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems When Asus released its Eee PC, praise was almost universal. People loved the device's size, low price, and the fact it came with Linux appealed to many geeks. Consequently, the device sold rather well, and was a hit for Asus. However, the device had two major shortcomings: its small screen (7" 800x480), and its relatively short battery life. Asus took the critcism to heart, and came up with the Asus Eee PC 900, which has a 9" 1024x600 screen. So, what's the verdict?
Thread beginning with comment 311524
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
INTEL ATOM!!!
by bornagainenguin on Fri 25th Apr 2008 22:48 UTC
bornagainenguin
Member since:
2005-08-07

That's what I'm waiting for myself...

I'll appreciate the bigger screen, no doubt--and I'm sure the extra space will come in handy on the Linux version; but it's the Intel Atom processor that I've been waiting for to make my purchase and I've been following the ASUS Eee almost a year now. Not quite since the announcement but maybe a month or two after it is when I started to get some serious lust for the Eee...

The brain dead (non-mobile) processor was what kept me away. I've already been through that once with my Dell Inspiron 5100 and the last thing I wanted was to go through it again with a ultramobile. As it is the battery life on this Dell is so poor I spend most of my time on it tethered to a power cord. ;)

Once the ASUS Eee is finally on the Intel Atom then I think we'll all start really seeing this device show its potential.

--bornagainpenguin

Reply Score: 2

RE: INTEL ATOM!!!
by buff on Fri 25th Apr 2008 23:08 in reply to "INTEL ATOM!!!"
buff Member since:
2005-11-12

I upgraded the memory on mine to one gig of RAM. On Linux I don't notice any lag using applications like Open Office, Thunar or Audacious. The flash RAM drive no doubt contributes to a zippy feel of applications launching. You would be surprised how much gusto the little CPU puts out. CPU clock speed alone is not the only variable to look at. The architecture of the eee lends itself to quickly launching programs and quick task switching. If you tried one out you would probably agree with me.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: INTEL ATOM!!!
by miscz on Fri 25th Apr 2008 23:19 in reply to "RE: INTEL ATOM!!!"
miscz Member since:
2005-07-17

The main advantage of Intel Atom is low power consumption, not the performance boost and that's what bornagainpenguin was referring to. Right now Eee suffers a lot from short battery life, especially after the bump to 900MHz on its Celeron-M and bigger screen.

I've read somewhere that Asus cheated by sending reviewers the high capacity batteries to the reviewers while regular ones had much worse capabitilies.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: INTEL ATOM!!!
by Luis on Sat 26th Apr 2008 03:03 in reply to "RE: INTEL ATOM!!!"
Luis Member since:
2006-04-28

The flash RAM drive no doubt contributes to a zippy feel of applications launching.

And now a patch[1] was submitted (and applied) to the Linux kernel that will allow faster I/O. You'll need to upgrade to 2.6.26 once it's out, though...

[1]http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/20/283

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: INTEL ATOM!!!
by ohbrilliance on Sat 26th Apr 2008 03:49 in reply to "INTEL ATOM!!!"
ohbrilliance Member since:
2005-07-07

"The brain dead (non-mobile) processor was what kept me away. I've already been through that once with my Dell Inspiron 5100"

You can hardly compare the Celeron-m in the eee to the Pentium 4s in the 5100.. we're talking TDP of 5 watts compared to TDP of 60 to 80 watts. Those Dell 5100s were ovens!

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: INTEL ATOM!!!
by bornagainenguin on Sat 26th Apr 2008 06:18 in reply to "RE: INTEL ATOM!!!"
bornagainenguin Member since:
2005-08-07

ohbrilliance said...

You can hardly compare the Celeron-m in the eee to the Pentium 4s in the 5100.. we're talking TDP of 5 watts compared to TDP of 60 to 80 watts.


I hear you, I hear you...but we're still talking about a device saddled with a processor that won't allow it to be the best it can be. Considering how many of those old P4 crippled laptops are still in working condition due to the strain of overheating and lack of meaningful power management... Can you blame me for being doubly cautious now, not to make the same mistake twice?

ohbrilliance said...
Those Dell 5100s were ovens!


What do you mean were? I'm typing this on my Inspiron 5100 right now, running Hardy Heron 8.04--the display shows my heat as being 138F~ with just Firefox and Synaptic open. If I try to open anything else I'm looking at 160F~...

Still what other (non-Apple) laptop do you know of that can run Windows, Linux and OSX86 as well as this one?

--bornagainpenguin

Reply Parent Score: 2