To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
License is different you can not purchase a license for 2003 only current versions for Microsoft products but yes it is the license you would use for older products depending on the product. So Office 2007 is the correct licenese for 2003. Windows XP is different you can not purchase a license for it you should be purchasing OEM versions of Windows XP. You should be purchasing Windows 2003 or Windows 2008 license for Windows 2000 Server families whether for CAL's or Devices.
Basically, the OS licensing we do is slightly convoluted...or at least it is to me. Maybe it's SOP to other folks. We purchase a machine from our system builder that has an XP OEM license on it. It's then ghosted with the copy of the Open License version of XP that we've purchased. According to MS it's legit, not that it's any big surprise. The license has been purchased, twice, almost.
Now with the advent of Vistard with MAC, and VLM (?), the world gets a whole lot more difficult.
And even if it weren't, I don't think anybody's conscience is going to be pricked if they purchase a newer version of a product because the older version is no longer available and pirate the older version.
As far as businesses are concerned, from a legal standpoint, do you think MS is really going to drag some company into court for purchasing a Vista license and installing XP? That's called a PR nightmare.
As for Vista, I really don't see it as being all that bad. Though it certainly doesn't have enough improvements to justify upgrading on an older machine, if you're getting a brand new PC with decent specs, it should run just fine.
If the only reason you'd go through the trouble of downgrading to XP is to maintain compatability with some app that worked in XP and not in Vista, if it hasn't been ported to Vista yet, it's probably not going to be. So whether you do it now or later, you're eventually going to have to ween yourself off of that app, so might as well be now.
Agreed, but we're not willing to beta-test Microsoft's half-shod crap because they say it's "Released to Manufacturing". Another thing, this little Service Pack 1 for Vista is nothing more than PR fodder to appease the IT managers whose policies dictate that no major OS upgrades will happen prior to a first service pack.
Get this, my company is just now ending the transition from Win2k to XP. Rushing into Vista isn't anywhere in the 5 year plan. We're still NT4 domain, for that matter. And, yes, that is changing soon....hopefully.





Member since:
2006-10-10
I'm not sure what's new about this. Every MS Office license that we purchase at my company is for 2007 Pro, yet we are installing 2003 Pro. It's perfectly legal and validated by Microsoft. In fact, I think the purchase of an XP license allowed for legal installs of Windows 2000.