Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th Apr 2008 21:38 UTC, submitted by kiddo
Thread beginning with comment 311810
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-03-16
So there needs to be a way to measure the amount of space available for the trash VS how much is actually in use, then have the trash can fill up gradually, say, like, a REAL trash can?
So that way, you can see a trash can with only a small bit full, or half-way, and you can ignore it safely, until it comes up to being overflowing, then you have to empty it.
(Using the idea behind the Kitchen Trashcan here, bear with me)
So therefor, we can safely ignore x% of the graphical representation of the virtual trash with a normal human like behavior?
so, in essence, we either ignore the stuff and let it flow, or we go OCD and keep it clean and tidy.
wow, what a decision.
this almost makes me want to make a windows app to do exactly as i said, just to see how much people will use it... (let me know if anyone is actually interested in this idea, ok?)
thank god when in linux, i have the menu "delete", aka, "bypass trash and do a full delete" menu option enabled. that way i dont have to worry about the trash can.
not like as if i have one on my gnome desktop anyway, i de-activated it's icon.