Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Apr 2008 17:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 312318
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: How is silverlight worse then flash?
by BluenoseJake on Thu 1st May 2008 11:21
in reply to "RE[3]: How is silverlight worse then flash?"
RE[5]: How is silverlight worse then flash?
by hobgoblin on Thu 1st May 2008 14:35
in reply to "RE[4]: How is silverlight worse then flash?"
RE[4]: How is silverlight worse then flash?
by hobgoblin on Thu 1st May 2008 13:15
in reply to "RE[3]: How is silverlight worse then flash?"
RE[5]: How is silverlight worse then flash?
by lemur2 on Thu 1st May 2008 14:11
in reply to "RE[4]: How is silverlight worse then flash?"
so they are no better then a kernel binary blob for some hardware.
heh, i would not be surprised if videos played by said blobs ended up showing a lesser quality video...
heh, i would not be surprised if videos played by said blobs ended up showing a lesser quality video...
The format has been opened up ... open for implementation by anyone.
Open source players such as swfdec - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swfdec and
gnash - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnash will benefit greatly.
IMO it won't take long and Adobe's binary blob won't be appreciably better than open source alternatives such as these.







Member since:
2005-07-06
Get your facts right.
Here are quotes from from MS:
No code has been contributed to a community under a liberal license. (As Miguel says, "Microsoft will give Novell access to the test suites for Silverlight to ensure that we have a compatible specification.") No IP has been contributed to a community under a liberal license. ("The codecs will be binary codecs, and they will only be licensed for use with Moonlight on a web browser".)