Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st May 2008 12:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 312387
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: What does it mean for Open Source?
by lemur2 on Thu 1st May 2008 13:57
in reply to "RE[3]: What does it mean for Open Source?"
I tried gnash but it's really not up to scratch with what i need it for
Hopefully its development will accelerate now.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=571
"The source code for the Flash player is still closed source and proprietary, but removing restrictions on licensing and even looking at the format specifications goes a long, long way towards alleviating fears of vendor lock-in. This will give a boost to open source players like Gnash and swfdec. While it's unlikely that the open source players will ever catch up to the performance and features in the official Adobe player, it's nice to have the option to get the technology from multiple places in case something happens to Adobe such as, say, getting acquired by Microsoft."
I think there is a strong chance that zdnet significantly under-rates the power of open source development.
It doesn't look like gnash is ever going to be a "Google Summer of Code" project, though. !!
Edited 2008-05-01 14:05 UTC






Member since:
2006-07-04
I tried gnash but it's really not up to scratch with what i need it for