Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st May 2008 19:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 312483
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples
by superman on Thu 1st May 2008 21:18
in reply to "RE: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[3]: Comment by kittynipples
by amadensor on Thu 1st May 2008 21:59
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[3]: Comment by kittynipples
by Oliver on Thu 1st May 2008 22:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[3]: Comment by kittynipples
by tyrione on Sun 4th May 2008 22:22
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples
by Oliver on Thu 1st May 2008 22:28
in reply to "RE: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[3]: Comment by kittynipples
by umccullough on Thu 1st May 2008 23:24
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples"
Welcome to reality, copy something of the behaviour of Apples beloved OS and they will sue you until the end of the world
That isn't copyright infringement (unless you copied their logo and/or artwork directly) - that's trademark and/or patent infringement.
These are completely different topics. It's unfortunate that people get those mixed up so much.
edit: added clarification on logo/artwork
Edited 2008-05-01 23:25 UTC
RE[3]: Comment by kittynipples
by lemur2 on Thu 1st May 2008 23:57
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[3]: Comment by kittynipples
by javiercero1 on Fri 2nd May 2008 04:09
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples"
RE[2]: Comment by kittynipples
by lemur2 on Thu 1st May 2008 23:45
in reply to "RE: Comment by kittynipples"
""Linux Is a Copy of UNIX" I thought this was common knowledge?
And only copying someone's ideas to make something similar, or exactly the same, is *not* the same as copying copyrighted works
Thus Darl is a moron if he believes this is why Linux is wrong. " Linux isn't wrong ... in exactly the same way that any collaboration isn't wrong.
If we didn't have collaborative works ... there would be no innternational telephone network. There would be no shipping. There would be no international flights.
There would be no food industry, no agriculture. There would be no industry at all, in fact, without collaboration and working interfaces between the efforts of separate parties.
Collaboration ... in the sense of many parties working together to make separate small pieces work well together to form a wider system ... is an essential engineering process. Without it, our species would revert to living in caves.
Linux implement POSIX. Linux does not copy Unix.
It's like Firefox implementing HTML. Firefox is not copying IE, It's just implementing HTML.
It's like Firefox implementing HTML. Firefox is not copying IE, It's just implementing HTML.
Exactly so. Linux is a collaborative work of many parties ... it is an operating system that implements the POSIX standards.
There is nothing at all "wrong" with that in any way at all ... despite the greed and delusions of some corporate money-grubbing types.






Member since:
2006-01-26
I thought this was common knowledge?
And only copying someone's ideas to make something similar, or exactly the same, is *not* the same as copying copyrighted works
Thus Darl is a moron if he believes this is why Linux is wrong.