Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th May 2008 21:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 312975
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's four pages
It doesn't matter how long it is. A good idea is a good idea in two lines and in ten pages. Just because it can be detailed for hours doesn't make any idea good. Note, with that I don't say this particular idea is no good.
The only thing is, it's hard to satisfy everybody's taste. E.g. I don't like the Mac-style of application installing, I prefer dpkg, and I don't like the folder names with compulsory capitals, and so on. That doesn't mean the concept itself is wrong.
'Note, with that I don't say this particular idea is no good. '
But you are missing the point of the above poster.
He critisized the guy that said Gobolinux is not a good idea, but that other guy did not give ANY REASON AT ALL.
Noone can act upon FUD
And btw, this suggestion here is different from Gobolinux in a few key areas. I am not saying it is good or bad here, but it is obviously that there are a few people who neither read this, nor know about Gobolinux - or opt to simply not give any reasons at all why something is "good" or "bad".
It is pointless to debate about opinions without people giving any REASONS behind them.







Member since:
2005-06-29
Oh? You do know what GoboLinux is, right?
Care to elaborate? That's four pages of detailed explanations and user scenarios you just read, and all you can counter it with is "not such a good idea"?