Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th May 2008 21:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 312992
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
you have a reliance on your vendor (situation with all current Linux distributions).
GNU/Linux as no reliance on vendor for anything.
The linux kernel as many version and modification of itself. So do the library , so do the x systems , so do the windows environment , etc ...
SLS ... Debian ... Ubuntu ...
SLS ... Slackware ... SLAX
Red Hat ... Mandriva ... PcLinuxOS
Xfree , X.org
KDE , Gnome , Xfce
ETC ...
You got acces to source code , it's Open Source developed , and it's Free software.
You can fix it yourself , train someone to fix it or hire someone else to fix it for you.
Nice try, Thom - if you're just reading it casually you almost miss the hand-waving about binaries that don't belong in any particular 'program bundle',
Miss? It's right there in the article:
"I also took a cue from Mac OS X by creating the specific /System/Utilities directory, where the operating system can store utilities such as the Activity Monitor, graphical Bluetooth tools, Network Utilty (graphical ping, whois, etc.), those sorts of things. What does and doesn't go into that directory is fairly arbitrary, and is open for debate. Other binaries that usually reside in /bin on UNIX systems can also go into /System (say, something like /System/Binaries, since this is the 21st century - why use unclear acronyms)."
'If you use shared libraries, you have a reliance on your vendor (situation with all current Linux distributions).'
That is true, and I am one that constantly critisizes the upstream vendors/maintainers as well, but you see - the situation on Mac is as bad as on Windows in that you are dependent on a company just as well.
So all these worlds more or less have similar problems. You depend on someone else.
Now, with similar problems already, I as a user would still like to choose AppDirs instead of FHS.
I dont want that others enforce the FHS upon me. But the big distributions have no inclination to change to AppDirs at all.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Nice try, Thom - if you're just reading it casually you almost miss the hand-waving about binaries that don't belong in any particular 'program bundle', and about the issue of shared libraries, which is of course the big drawback of the OS X system that you *don't* mention (because it persists in your vision). If you use shared libraries, you have a reliance on your vendor (situation with all current Linux distributions). If you don't, you have security issues and ancient bugs that were fixed long ago cropping up all over the place (situation with Windows and OS X).