Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th May 2008 21:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 313051
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Locking still necessary
by RandomGuy on Tue 6th May 2008 16:54
in reply to "RE: Locking still necessary"
RE[3]: Locking still necessary
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 6th May 2008 17:00
in reply to "RE[2]: Locking still necessary"
Doesn't every program need a unique identifier?
How do you make sure that no two programs can have the same identifier if everybody can set up a server and name/tag the apps as he pleases?
How do you make sure that no two programs can have the same identifier if everybody can set up a server and name/tag the apps as he pleases?
They're not identifiers, they're values stored as an attribute. Even if you have ten billion million attributes with value 345, if they belong to different files, that simply doesn't matter.







Member since:
2005-06-29
The server?
Who says people can't set up their own server for distributing program bundles? It wouldn't be too hard, as long as the file system on the server preserves the attributes.
I also envision a set of command line tools that allow you to compare/update program bundles. Something like:
$ compare "/Programs/Garden Designer.bundle" "ftp.stuff.org/pub/bundles/Garden Designer.bundle"
Output:
$ /Programs/Garden Designer.bundle:438
$ ftp.stuff.org/pub/bundles/Garden Designer.bundle:439