Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th May 2008 08:54 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Thread beginning with comment 313369
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Qt can also be used in free software as well as proprietary software.
Only if you buy a license for proprietary software. "
Err, no.
Qt can be used in free software without having to buy a license.
If you do buy a license, then Qt can be used for proprietary software as well, not instead of.






Member since:
2005-07-07
Qt can also be used in free software as well as proprietary software. I am absolutely certain because I use it for free software as a KDE developer and for proprietary software as a developer in a software company.
Actually some of the alternatives have only plain LGPL licences, which means it is not possible to link them or parts of them statically into a product without distributing all the rest as relinkable object files as well.
There is no way our management would approve these.