Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th May 2008 21:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 313552
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Tech on the street
by stestagg on Fri 9th May 2008 10:40
in reply to "RE: Tech on the street"
I see a premise, but no conclusion.
There is an implicit one. The issue here is the lack of a clear definition of what makes something a 'basement project'. The OP is making the point that he doesn't believe enough people are aware of these OSs to move them out of the realm of basement projects.
RE[3]: Tech on the street
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 10th May 2008 01:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Tech on the street"
There is an implicit one. The issue here is the lack of a clear definition of what makes something a 'basement project'.
On that last point, at least, we agree. Thom's writeup equated "basement projects" with single-developer projects. Yet none of the examples have been "one-man shows" for at least a half-decade now.
The OP is making the point that he doesn't believe enough people are aware of these OSs to move them out of the realm of basement projects.
I'm not convinced that that point has much significance. In 1998, the exact same comment could have been made about Linux. Or c. 1988, it could have been said about Windows.






Member since:
2005-07-06
...and? I see a premise, but no conclusion.