Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 10th May 2008 20:27 UTC, submitted by rosebug
Bugs & Viruses 1983. The year of the IBM PC XT, the Apple Lisa, Pioneer 10 leaving the solar system, and Hooters opening up shop in Florida. It's also the birthyear of a 25 year old BSD bug, squashed only a few days ago.
Thread beginning with comment 313794
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not 'UNIX' bug
by Doc Pain on Sun 11th May 2008 14:26 UTC in reply to "RE: Not 'UNIX' bug"
Doc Pain
Member since:

[BSD is] called Berkeley Unix

I think you're wrong. At least judging from the websites of the "three big" BSDs, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD, you can read:

FreeBSD(R) is an advanced operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium(R) and Athlon(TM)), amd64 compatible (including Opteron(TM), Athlon(TM)64, and EM64T), UltraSPARC(R), IA-64, PC-98 and ARM architectures. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX(R) developed at the University of California, Berkeley.

The NetBSD Project is an international collaborative effort of a large group of people, to produce a freely available and redistributable UNIX-like operating system, NetBSD. In addition to our own work, NetBSD contains a variety of other free software, including 4.4BSD Lite from the University of California, Berkeley.

The OpenBSD project produces a FREE, multi-platform 4.4BSD-based UNIX-like operating system. Our efforts emphasize portability, standardization, correctness, proactive security and integrated cryptography. OpenBSD supports binary emulation of most programs from SVR4 (Solaris), FreeBSD, Linux, BSD/OS, SunOS and HP-UX.

The term "Berkeley Unix" or "Berkeley UNIX" isn't mentioned anywhere. Refering to the article you linked to, the term "Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix" seems to be intended as a kind of title, not as a name; it could be "Twenty Years of UNIX development at Berkeley", too.

You may want to have a look at the BSD family tree to learn about the BSDs' origins:

EDIT: I changed the (TM), (R) and (C) special characters into a more convenient form because the OSNews comments system doesn't seem to handle them correctly. They are displayed correctly in the input form, but aren't displayed correctly in the thread later on...

Edited 2008-05-11 14:40 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Not 'UNIX' bug
by ratmonkey on Mon 12th May 2008 03:32 in reply to "RE[2]: Not 'UNIX' bug"
ratmonkey Member since:

Good lord boy... You obviously have never studied the history of Unix.

Reply Parent Score: 2