Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th May 2008 17:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 313902
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, where exactly do you see price discrimination in this case?
Price discrimination also might be used as a predatory pricing tactic -- setting prices below cost to certain customers -- to harm competition at the supplier's level.
1. Where do you see that MS is setting prices below cost,
2. and that it is for certain customers only?
3. How do you know Xandros Linux is not priced below cost to harm competition too?
Edited 2008-05-13 03:05 UTC
Well, where exactly do you see price discrimination in this case?
Price discrimination also might be used as a predatory pricing tactic -- setting prices below cost to certain customers -- to harm competition at the supplier's level.
1. Where do you see that MS is setting prices below cost,
2. And that it is for certain customers only?
Price discrimination also might be used as a predatory pricing tactic -- setting prices below cost to certain customers -- to harm competition at the supplier's level.
1. Where do you see that MS is setting prices below cost,
2. And that it is for certain customers only?
1. We don't know the internal costs of XP however they sell the current OEM for over $100 AUD. (nearer 150 I think) so if $32USD is not less then cost then there profit margins are HUGE. (Note you can only support profit margins like that if you have a monopoly)
2. The conditions of the license to limit for certain customers, customers buying ULPC's with less than 1GB Ram etc.
So as far as I can tell it matches on both counts.






Member since:
2005-07-06
Look up the definition of price discrimination and loss-leader.