Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th May 2008 07:08 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 313928
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I've used HP laptops, where they did not function out of the box, because of the conflict of craplets installed on the machine, and a bad RaLink Vista driver. It's as if some lowest-of-the-chain tech was given the job of setting up the image, and he didn't bother re-booting the machine after installing everything.
RE[2]: HP's lack of testing
by kaiwai on Tue 13th May 2008 12:38
in reply to "RE: HP's lack of testing"
I've used HP laptops, where they did not function out of the box, because of the conflict of craplets installed on the machine, and a bad RaLink Vista driver. It's as if some lowest-of-the-chain tech was given the job of setting up the image, and he didn't bother re-booting the machine after installing everything.
I remember when I purchased an HP laptop for the first time; it was chocked to the brim with crap: I truly couldn't believe it when I saw it. To make matters worse, the BIOS was buggy, the ACPI was old and out of date (people are STILL shipping laptops with ACPI 1.0?).
The best experience so far? I've got a Lenovo thinkpad; wonderful - and it runs OpenSolaris like a champ. I'm not too sure what the consumer Lenovo laptops are like, but their Thinkpad range is simply awesome.







Member since:
2006-03-20
If true, the reboot issue says a lot about HP's lack of basic testing.