Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th May 2008 20:35 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 314140
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Development has not slowed down?
by mattst88 on Wed 14th May 2008 19:40
in reply to "RE[3]: Development has not slowed down?"
All right, maybe the bugginess of the driver is just due to the incompentency of intel programmers, and has nothing to do with xorg server.
It's easier to take a shot at people if they're nameless, isn't it?
I hardly think incompetent is the correct term in any sense in the cases of keithp, anholt, jbarnes, et al.
RE[5]: Development has not slowed down?
by j-kidd on Thu 15th May 2008 14:51
in reply to "RE[4]: Development has not slowed down?"
So you are more into name calling huh? No problem. Here's a few based on the responses (or lack of) in freedesktop bugzilla: Hong Liu, Wang Zhenyu, Gordon Jin, Xiang HaiHao.
The bottom line is that the intel driver is full of bugs, and who gotta be responsible for that if not intel programmers?
Those names you mentioned could be uber hackers for all I care.






Member since:
2005-07-06
I feel your pain. I do. From my personal experience, the quality of xorg server has gone way downhill since version 1.3.
For a good example, look at the status of intel driver, which incidentally is the one being mentioned in the article.
Here's a listing of intel driver related bugs in ubuntu (127 in total):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel
Here's one that affects me:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212453
All right, maybe the bugginess of the driver is just due to the incompentency of intel programmers, and has nothing to do with xorg server.