Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th May 2008 14:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 314232
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Lots of minor things worse in F9
by sbergman27 on Thu 15th May 2008 05:06
in reply to "RE[2]: Lots of minor things worse in F9"
Should, and Do are two different things. Autodetection is *not* perfect,
And not due to deficiencies in the detection algorithms. Monitors lie about their capabilities and the manufacturers don't care. They just ship a driver disk (for Windows, of course) with the monitor to "fix" it. EDIDs were never more than a pleasant fantasy.
RE[4]: Lots of minor things worse in F9
by melkor on Thu 15th May 2008 05:15
in reply to "RE[3]: Lots of minor things worse in F9"
I've never seen someone use a installation disk for a monitor! I've seen generic monitors work perfectly fine on Windows at various resolutions other than default crappy ones.
I'm always funny why Linux guys just simply can't admit that Linux has some major issues that are not being fixed, and it seems there is no interest in fixing them. And we wonder why Linux isn't the desktop of the year, and never will be?
Dave






Member since:
2006-12-16
Should, and Do are two different things. Autodetection is *not* perfect, nor will it ever be, so why tempt fate?
Dave