Linked by Adam S on Wed 21st May 2008 19:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 315163
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Right. Let's just think about the past. We had this before with Java. Microsoft told everybody about their great Java support and indeed included it in their development tools. The result: MS's "java" had several proprietary extensions which made it incompatible to the standard. Sun had to fight MS in court for years to stop this crippled "support" which was just another attempt to keep MS' vendor lock-in. After that, you could see how much MS really cared for Java: They removed their support and instead created the competing .NET. I expect them to do the same attempt on OpenDocument.
Microsoft have announced that they are joining the OASIS committee that designs ODF.
http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2008/may08/05-21ExpandedFo...
"Consistent with its interoperability principles, in which the company committed to work with others toward robust, consistent and interoperable implementations across a broad range of widely deployed products, the company has also announced it will be an active participant in the future evolution of ODF, Open XML, XPS and PDF standards.
Microsoft will join the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) technical committee working on the next version of ODF and will take part in the ISO/IEC working group being formed to work on ODF maintenance. Microsoft employees will also take part in the ISO/IEC working group that is being formed to maintain Open XML and the ISO/IEC working group that is being formed to improve interoperability between these and other ISO/IEC-recognized document formats. The company will also be an active participant in the ongoing standardization and maintenance activities for XPS and PDF. It will also continue to work with the IT community to promote interoperability between document file formats, including Open XML and ODF, as well as Digital Accessible Information System (DAISY XML), the foundation of the globally accepted DAISY standard for reading and publishing navigable multimedia content."
That never happened with Java ... Sun had control.
If Microsoft want to participate in OpenDocument development ... great! Fantastic! It means that everybody will be able to implement whatever goes into the format.
This was actually what was intended for OpenDocument from day 1 ... Microsoft were invited to participate, but refused to do so.
That doesn't say much. Microsoft was also a member of the OpenGL standards board, that didn't stop them from the unholy things they did to OpenGL in Vista.
If Microsoft would finally be really playing fair in the Office place it would clearly hurt their sales. No one i know would still shovel 150€ towards Microsoft for their unsupported student version if they could get a really compatible Office suite for free.
Well maybe they really start playing fair this time, but after all those years lying, sabotaging, blackmailing, bribing, stealing and deceiving it would be naive simply to take their word now.







Member since:
2006-01-16
Right.
Let's just think about the past. We had this before with Java. Microsoft told everybody about their great Java support and indeed included it in their development tools.
The result: MS's "java" had several proprietary extensions which made it incompatible to the standard. Sun had to fight MS in court for years to stop this crippled "support" which was just another attempt to keep MS' vendor lock-in. After that, you could see how much MS really cared for Java: They removed their support and instead created the competing .NET.
I expect them to do the same attempt on OpenDocument.
Edited 2008-05-21 23:28 UTC