Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th May 2008 17:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 315632
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
When you're programming, you want to focus on your work.
True. I think that there were originally roughly two groups who were attracted to GNU/Linux: people who wanted to use an affordable UNIX-workalike on i386 hardware, and people who use GNU/Linux because it is free software. (Yes, this is an overgeneralization.)
For the first group, the availability of source code under a free license is possibly an additional advantage, but they are not (fully) attached to it. It's not that surprising that people within this group switch to OS X on the desktop: it quacks like UNIX, it runs on relatively low-end/cheap hardware, and generally has less hassles than GNU/Linux.
This can clearly be seen in the BSD community. Many BSD users/developers use OS X on the desktop these days, and I'd say that they have historically been less attached to copyleft licenses et al.
Edited 2008-05-26 19:55 UTC
You're right, but only to an extent. Vim's code completion and features along with some macros is more than enough for some people. Vim runs the same on every platform for me. Not being a free software purist but more of an open suoecs purist, Linux is more than enough for me.
RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by PlatformAgnostic on Tue 27th May 2008 08:47
in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"





Member since:
2005-11-10
When you're programming, you want to focus on your work. It's hard enough juggling the architectural implications of your next line of code, without dealing with your operating system grating against you.
It's hundreds of subtle things that make Mac OS X an awesome developer platform, and it's certainly no surprise to me.