Linked by on Tue 27th May 2008 15:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 315885
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-15
besides missing a few no name windows editions like 95, 98, 98-2nd and ME your odd/even theory just may be true.
if they work on the 2008 kernel then 7 should turn out to be a great OS. whether it's worth paying money for is another story, but 2008 ran better for me as a vm on vista ultimate than vista itself.
personally I would much prefer to see a x64 only edition which came with vm of a vista x86 basic edition.