Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jun 2008 08:12 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Thread beginning with comment 316830
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Ubuntu is better for me.
by mnemonics on Tue 3rd Jun 2008 17:57
in reply to "RE[2]: Ubuntu is better for me."
RE[4]: Ubuntu is better for me.
by noamsml on Wed 4th Jun 2008 11:33
in reply to "RE[3]: Ubuntu is better for me."
RE[3]: Ubuntu is better for me.
by apoclypse on Tue 3rd Jun 2008 21:19
in reply to "RE[2]: Ubuntu is better for me."




Member since:
2006-04-21
or for OSX for that matter, just don't run Safari
In a world where unauthorized remote access to OS is getting harder, it's well known that the trend is to use cross-plateform application as an attack vector (firefox, flash, VLC, "you-name-it"...).
Could you please give an example of a real threat (no proof of concept) concerning Safari that haven't been patched already ?
Sure enough, Safari is no more bullet-proof than other web browsers, but please explain how it is more insecure than say firefox ?
AFAIK Firefox users are not safer than Safari users...