Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jun 2008 22:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 316923
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by satan666
by leos on Wed 4th Jun 2008 04:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by satan666"
Here is the Microsoft press release on Microsoft's site about it: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/sep07/09-04Silverligh...
Interesting. That's the first official mention I've seen. Then again, the official silverlight site (http://silverlight.net/) has absolutely no mention of linux anywhere, not even some indication that it could be eventually a supported platform. So for now I wouldn't put too much stock in that press release.
Edited 2008-06-04 04:54 UTC
RE[5]: Comment by satan666
by BluenoseJake on Wed 4th Jun 2008 12:38
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by satan666"
Interesting. That's the first official mention I've seen. Then again, the official silverlight site (http://silverlight.net/) has absolutely no mention of linux anywhere, not even some indication that it could be eventually a supported platform. So for now I wouldn't put too much stock in that press release.
That is interesting, considering that press release is almost a year old, coming from Sept 4 2007. I would say that if that's the first time you've heard official mention of Moonlight from MS, then you haven't been listening.
RE[4]: Comment by satan666
by lemur2 on Wed 4th Jun 2008 04:55
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by satan666"
"I would much rather have a somewhat inferior official Linux version of the Flash plugin than Moonlight, which isn't even officially acknowledged by Microsoft, and could be obsoleted or shut down by Microsoft at some point in the future.
You are of course welcome to not use Moonlight, but to say it isn't officially acknowledged by Microsoft is completely false.
Here is the Microsoft press release on Microsoft's site about it: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/sep07/09-04Silverligh... "
The "officially acknowledged" bit is off the mark ... but the "could be obsoleted or dropped by Microsoft at any time" observation is absolutely spot on.
1. Moonlight = Binary codecs, available only from Microsoft.
2. Microsoft counts Linux as its major threat.
You do the math.
RE[5]: Comment by satan666
by jpobst on Wed 4th Jun 2008 14:32
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by satan666"
The "officially acknowledged" bit is off the mark ... but the "could be obsoleted or dropped by Microsoft at any time" observation is absolutely spot on.
1. Moonlight = Binary codecs, available only from Microsoft.
1. Moonlight = Binary codecs, available only from Microsoft.
Microsoft could drop the binary codecs used by Moonlight, but Moonlight itself is fully open source code developed and released by the Mono project. Moonlight is also developed to use ffmpeg codecs should you choose not to use the Microsoft binary codecs. (Moonlight does not ship with ffmpeg for obvious legal reasons.)






Member since:
2006-09-26
You are of course welcome to not use Moonlight, but to say it isn't officially acknowledged by Microsoft is completely false.
Here is the Microsoft press release on Microsoft's site about it: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/sep07/09-04Silverligh...