Linked by Robert Escue on Wed 4th Jun 2008 05:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 316934
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I wished that I had more time and more hardware to test with, the iozone graphs definitely show some interesting patterns and it would be cool to see if they are limited by the hardware the test was initially run on, or it is a characteristic of the performance of the system.






Member since:
2005-07-07
From the graphs, it looks like ZFS provides much better filesystem performance. Notice how the read speed peaks for small files (well, it plateaus not peaks...) where it appears to be almost double the speed of ext3. As the filesize increases, performance drops to ext3 peak levels and it maintains that performance throughout.
I think that is significant as predictable filesystem performance allows you to have a better estimate of how your server/workstation will perform.