While I can personally attest for the gains Microsoft made when it comes to Windows Vista's performance between its release-to-manufacture November 2006 and now, there is no denying the fact that Vista simply isn't made for running on lower-specced computers. In addition, while Vista brings interesting new features and massive overhauls of many subsystems, a lot of people simply don't like it. Sadly for them, Windows XP is going out-of-sale 30 June. However, there are plenty of loopholes - PC World listed them.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2006-01-06
Vista runs just fine on most hardware sold within the past couple years, despite what the zealots say. You need at least 2GB of memory and a reasonable video card, of course, but the cost of those items is negligible. From what some people say, you'd think they had to give a kidney to get Vista running.
Edited 2008-06-06 06:44 UTC
Member since:2005-07-06
Everything is negligible when your a clueless moron ...
New Graphic card and ram are not given away for free.
It's also pissing people of to have to add 200$ more for a 1500$ computer they just bought that as a Windows Vista ready sticker on it.
If I was a zealot you would be dead by now. Because that's what zealot do and are , they kill people they disagree with. You have NEVER met a zealot in your life.
Member since:2005-07-06
No offense Thom , as you are really easily offended but your comparing apple to oranges and reading you current post is the clue.
* Who's OEM vendor in 2001 where selling computer with easily swappable CPU ? Most of them where soldiering the CPU in those days and changing the CPU would void the warranty.
* What kind/brand of Motherboard are we talking about here one with expansion slot and upgradability ? That's not really a 2001 OEM motherboard I know.
* What vista are you running and talking about ?
* What onboard graphic card from 2001 run Vista perfectly ?
Why all the upgrade then ?
When real people change there 2001 computer to a 2008 low end one they expect it to be faster , have better software , don't crash and be secure and compatible with there older peripheric.
That's not the case for most people and most low end offer currently on the market in a XP VS vista home comparison.
BTW : Aerio problem are usually at the GPU end not the cpu or ram.
Member since:2006-02-15
* Who's OEM vendor in 2001 where selling computer with easily swappable CPU ? Most of them where soldiering the CPU in those days and changing the CPU would void the warranty.
Never EVER seen a single OEM PC with soldered-on CPU! I have never even heard of such things before you claimed that! Besides, Thom never said if his PC is OEM or not..
* What kind/brand of Motherboard are we talking about here one with expansion slot and upgradability ? That's not really a 2001 OEM motherboard I know.
What are you babbling about?
* What onboard graphic card from 2001 run Vista perfectly ?
Didn't see him claiming such either.
So, what are you trying to do? Troll about Vista?
Member since:2005-06-29
Local OEM here in The Netherlands, now called MyCom (used to be another name). Oh, and I've been dealing with computers for a long time, and I have NEVER seen a soldered-on processor in a normal home desktop machine. This one has a removable Athlon XP 1600+ at 1400Mhz, and a friend of mine from #haiku is sending me a 2800+ one he had lying around. It doesn't need it though, Vista runs fine with the 1600+. But hey, I don't turn down free upgrades.
Perhaps you don't know everything. It's an Epox EP-8KHA. Here's a review:
http://active-hardware.com/english/reviews/mainboard/ep-8kha.htm
Windows Vista Ultimate, SP1.
Who said anything about onboard? I upgraded a long time ago to a cheap 60USD GeForce 6300 128MB AGP card.
"All the upgrade"? An extra stick of RAM and a cheap video card?
Look, I have no reason to lie about these things. I have a machine that's so old it met Jesus, and it still runs Vista with a minor upgrade. You can blabber on about people buying low-end machines today, but I don't care, nor did I ever mention anything to that effect. All I stated was that my stone age machine runs Vista JUST FINE. You are free to come by here in The Netherlands and see for yourself - assuming your satnav can find East-Bumblefcuk.
Member since:2005-08-11
"Who's OEM vendor in 2001 where selling computer with easily swappable CPU ? Most of them where soldiering the CPU in those days and changing the CPU would void the warranty."
Uh, Most of them, it's only the most crappy, cheapest computers or MBs that come with soldered on CPUs, even in those days. None of the Dells, HPs or Gateways that I worked on in those days had soldered on CPUs.
"* What onboard graphic card from 2001 run Vista perfectly ? "
Uh, none of them, but who said anything about onboard graphics? I run Vista on almost identical hardware to what Thom is going to be running (Athlon 2800+/X1650Pro/1.5G ram) and it runs Vista perfectly.
I run Vista on the same specs Thom does, and it works great.
Member since:2005-09-13
Member since:
2005-06-29
My machine, from 2001, had a 60USD mem upgrade and now runs Vista, with full Aero, just fine. A friend of mine is sending me a spare processor for free he had lying around (so I'm going from an Athlon XP 1600+ to a 2800+) and my machine will chug along just fine.