To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The Xbox 360 is really not using Windows. It has a kernel based on the Xbox OS, which in turn was loosely based on the lowest-level basic parts of the Windows NT 5 kernel. By now, it's less closely related to desktop Windows than Windows CE is.
Anyway, the problem isn't that the kernel isn't portable. The problem is that the drivers and userland are not portable. Without it's huge base of existing software, Windows is effectively worthless. An ARM version of Windows could do nothing more than run the default included apps. An ARM version of Linux can do everything an x86 version can, except run the Flash plugin, Wine, and commercial games.
Even if you're selling the thing as an appliance, so third-party software doesn't matter, Microsoft are the only ones who could legally offer an appliance-style version of Windows. They don't - you'd have to use one of their desktop systems. At least with Linux, hardware manufacturers can roll their own.
That's ignoring WinCE, of course, but there's not a lot in the way of pre-existing Windows CE software to work with. A hardware manufacturer might write their own UI, but I doubt they'd write their own office suite or web browser.
Edited 2008-06-07 12:37 UTC





Member since:
2005-08-11
"Porting Windows to something that has nothing to do with x86, like PPC, ARM and so on -- now that's something. "
Windows used, and still, runs on the PPC, I doubt that it would take a massive effort to re-port it. A version of Windows runs on the xbox 360, which is a 3 core PPC design, it just runs a different userspace.
Edited 2008-06-06 20:06 UTC