To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Unfortunately, some apparently very respectable academics do make this general comparison (Murray Bookchin, Peter Staudenmaier, Janet Biehl, Frank Uekötter), see:
http://larouchepub.com/other/book_reviews/2007/3415green_n_brown.ht...
for a brief list of some of these arguments regarding 'ecofascism'
Thankfully, a more mature debate is emerging:
http://www.fis-kultur.de/buecher/buchlisten/Die.Eroberung.der.Natur...
You pays your money and takes your choice - some researchers see conservationism, deep ecology, etc. and fascism as anti-modern, and hence from the same intellectual mould, others see Nazism here as as the epitome of instrumental rationalism, the technophile essence of which continues to destroy the natural environment.




Member since:
2005-07-08
Hitler was vegetarian, he hated tobbaco and alcohol and under his government germans were one of the first countries that had laws that protected animals against experimentation, etc. And I don't think people looks at Greenpeace as a nazi organization.
What stops reiser 4 from getting more attention is mainly reiser4 itself, not Hans. Many people didn't like reiser 4 before Nina's dissapearance, many people don't like it now. Compare it with the excitement that other filesystems have generated - like ZFS.
Edited 2008-06-08 16:50 UTC