Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jun 2008 09:08 UTC, submitted by Edisamy
Thread beginning with comment 318745
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: "IBM lead OSS"???
by Kebabbert on Tue 17th Jun 2008 20:23
in reply to "RE[3]: "IBM lead OSS"???"
RE[5]: "IBM lead OSS"???
by shadow_x99 on Wed 18th Jun 2008 00:16
in reply to "RE[4]: "IBM lead OSS"???"
I agree that IBM auto-proclaiming itself as the undisputed leader is ridiculous, but I certainly agree that IBM is a leader in terms of contributions. Now the discussion is about which is the biggest contributors is not really important as long as YOU know the truth.
IBM can brag as much as they want about their contributions... At least they do contribute contrary to many smaller corporation who consume open-source software (BSD-License and/or Apache License and/or LGPL) without contributing a single line of code.





Member since:
2006-05-12
Is this really important to know which company contributed more? I mean, if Sun and IBM want to compare their respective e-peen that's their business...
On the other hand, having a strong enterprise-class database open-sourced, that's interesting news.