Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jun 2008 19:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 318837
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I wouldn't say so. The foleo in general was far less capable than even the first eeepc.
It had a slower processor and less RAM / storage, but I don't think people buy EeePCs because they want raw computing power.
Plus it was targeted at business users whereas the low cost subnotebooks seem to be marketed as more home consumer devices.
True - but that's more an issue of marketing focus. There aren't any fundamental, technological reasons that the Foleo would have been unsuitable for non-business users.





Member since:
2008-03-17
I wouldn't say so. The foleo in general was far less capable than even the first eeepc. Plus it was targeted at business users whereas the low cost subnotebooks seem to be marketed as more home consumer devices.