Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jun 2008 19:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 318941
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think Palm is just kicking themselves in general with the number of times they've chewed the dog in the market they created.
They certainly should be, with the huge number of advantages they've squandered. In many ways, they're in the same position as Apple on the desktop, circa the late 1990s - the Palm OS still sets the gold standard for usability (in terms of attention-to-small-detail, at least), but they're hampered by a software foundation that was outdated 10 years ago.
The foleo was a neat idea until I got to the limited feature set ment to bind it too there Treo line only.
AFAIK, it was (or would have been) possible to pair it with *any* bluetooth-capable phone - or use it on its own, for that matter. But much of the coverage by tech news sources did make it sound like the Foleo would only work in combination with a Treo.
I did like the form factor and was waiting to see it in person until they cancelled it. It would have been interesting to see what the hardware could do with alternate firmware. They'd have to do some updating if they decided to bring it back in against the exploding UMPC market.






Member since:
2007-09-06
I think Palm is just kicking themselves in general with the number of times they've chewed the dog in the market they created. I didn't think I'd ever buy from another vendor until they stalled the evolutino of the Tungsten line and never produced an upgrade too the T5 (lifedrive was on part if not a downgrade as was the TE). The foleo was a neat idea until I got to the limited feature set ment to bind it too there Treo line only.
Palm, your new benchmark is Nokia's N line; best of luck.