Linked by Adam S on Wed 18th Jun 2008 14:40 UTC
Microsoft The launch of Microsoft's new interoperability principles have been both cautiously welcomed and sceptically scrutinised as the company goes about convincing the IT industry that it is genuine in its pursuit to provide interoperability with rival products, more consumer choice, less vendor lock-in and greater collaboration with the open source community. Here, Microsoft Australia CTO Greg Stones gives some obviously polished PR-approved responses to questions from Computerworld regarding the motivations behind support for ODF and PDF, what the software giant is really gaining by providing support to rival formats, and the ambiguities in its Open Specification Promise. He also gives a painfully polished response to CNN's senior editor's claims that the company is trying to eliminate free software.Typical Microsoft PR response to tough questions, but interesting nonetheless....
Thread beginning with comment 318973
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: yeah right
by google_ninja on Wed 18th Jun 2008 16:50 UTC in reply to "yeah right"
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

Actually the whole page corrupted thing has been happening to alot of people on firefox 3. refresh a few times, and eventually it will render properly

this is what it looks like from my machine on ff3
http://s3.photobucket.com/albums/y92/googleninja/?action=view&curre...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: yeah right
by raver31 on Wed 18th Jun 2008 18:21 in reply to "RE: yeah right"
raver31 Member since:
2005-07-06

You picture looked pretty small, thats one of the limitations with photobucket, and I see you are using XP.

I was using Firefox3 under Linux... one of the major targets for Microsoft's interoperability programme I should think, yet it looks horrible to me.

here is what it looks like to me

http://www.freewebs.com/raver31/screenie.jpg

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: yeah right
by google_ninja on Wed 18th Jun 2008 20:12 in reply to "RE[2]: yeah right"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

A quick peek at the css shows us that the font-family is set to Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif. Verdana is very readable at smaller sizes, arial and helvetica are ok, but it look like you are defaulting to your systems sans-serif, which is probably bitstream something or other with anti-aliasing not played with.

If you want the web to look right, do yourself a favor and install the ms core fonts. If you dont want to do that, at least set your system defaults to something better then what its at now.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2