Linked by Adam S on Wed 18th Jun 2008 22:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 319048
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization
by robcj on Thu 19th Jun 2008 02:58
in reply to "RE: It's Not Virtualization"
RE[3]: It's Not Virtualization
by NeoX on Thu 19th Jun 2008 04:54
in reply to "RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization"
RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization
by l3v1 on Thu 19th Jun 2008 05:09
in reply to "RE: It's Not Virtualization"
I hope you're not referring to us. Our newsbit reads correctly to me.
Nevertheless, propagating misleading titles is as much wrong as creating a misleading title. I'd say you should've added a "source claims" or even "misleadingly claims" note at least in the news' description.
RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization
by umccullough on Thu 19th Jun 2008 17:38
in reply to "RE: It's Not Virtualization"






Member since:
2005-04-01
I hope you're not referring to us. Our newsbit reads correctly to me.