Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jun 2008 21:09 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 319304
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-11-11
I too am leery about embrace and extend. But I'd love to see them implement ODF correctly, and the lessening of lockin that would accompany them doing so. So why would they? Among other possible reasons, picture the marketing coup should they be able to implement it better than OOo.
If they had a good ODF implementation and still had that accessibility stuff they are supposed to be better at (I wouldn't know) I can see that being a good marketing point. Whatever the possibility of that, as long as MS thinks they could do it, that could be a strong motivation for them.
And that would be awesome. Office suites competing on features, and on being the best at implementing standards? That would be great. So would winning the lottery. I'll be keeping a skeptical eye open but I am excited to see how it plays out. So someone remind me where WordPerfect is sitting on the ODF issue?