Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Jun 2008 19:58 UTC, submitted by Aron Allen
Thread beginning with comment 319426
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by johkra
by Valhalla on Sat 21st Jun 2008 04:11
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by johkra"
Chris Lattner wrote:
-"The article was confused. llvm-gcc consistently compiles code 30-40% faster than GCC does when the optimizer is enabled (e.g. at) -O2. The generated code is usually 5-10% faster than GCC generated code, but obviously YMMV."
Thanks for the clarification. Must say that 'usually' 5-10% faster sounds great. Any chance you could point me to your sources regarding this as I'm really interested in code optimization.
RE[3]: Comment by johkra
by krausest on Sun 22nd Jun 2008 12:39
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by johkra"






Member since:
2005-11-19
The article was confused. llvm-gcc consistently compiles code 30-40% faster than GCC does when the optimizer is enabled (e.g. at) -O2. The generated code is usually 5-10% faster than GCC generated code, but obviously YMMV.