Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Jun 2008 11:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 319703
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Free and OpenSauce?
by bobi on Tue 24th Jun 2008 13:31
in reply to "RE[3]: Free and OpenSauce?"
Problem with OSS is that it will never ever create a tower of babel...instead it will create tens of thousands of mudcakes...just because there's no co-operation and every OSS developer wants to do their own little tinkering disregarding the others.
Let's wipe Opera because Firefox already has the same functionality. HAND.
*goes looking at his 1000 mediocre versions of Linux kernel, Open Office and Firefox. Or. Not.*
RE[5]: Free and OpenSauce?
by Kroc on Tue 24th Jun 2008 17:08
in reply to "RE[4]: Free and OpenSauce?"







Member since:
2006-02-16
If Opera was OSS maybe we'd finnaly get one with GTK-widgets.
If Opera was OSS we'd get an awesome portable fast renderingengine to use in projects.
etc etc...
If Opera was OSS every linux distro would have their own fork of it
If Opera was OSS, one opera fork would support GTK-widgets but suck with QT, one fork wouldnt support GTK-widgets and work with QT and third one would be mediocre with both.
If Opera was OSS, Opera itself wouldnt get any better, there would be just 300 forked projects for it that would act exactly same but have one single, usually meaningless, feature added to it to make it "different"
Problem with OSS is that it will never ever create a tower of babel...instead it will create tens of thousands of mudcakes...just because there's no co-operation and every OSS developer wants to do their own little tinkering disregarding the others.