Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Jun 2008 11:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 319723
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Free and OpenSauce?
by Kroc on Tue 24th Jun 2008 17:08
in reply to "RE[4]: Free and OpenSauce?"
RE[6]: Free and OpenSauce?
by TLZ_ on Tue 24th Jun 2008 17:26
in reply to "RE[5]: Free and OpenSauce?"
The only ones that mean anything to the majority is OpenOffice and Firefox.
And besides: Forking is a strength. Firefox was sort of a fork originally from Mozilla. The main product that they where pushing(Mozilla) had a number of issues that the fork fixed.
Essentially: Forking takes darwinism in software to a new extreme. If a projects has some flaws that the creators don't see, ignore, etc... someone can fork it and fix it. If these issues are important and large enough the fork will win through. Survival of the fittest(best software).







Member since:
2005-11-14
Problem with OSS is that it will never ever create a tower of babel...instead it will create tens of thousands of mudcakes...just because there's no co-operation and every OSS developer wants to do their own little tinkering disregarding the others.
Let's wipe Opera because Firefox already has the same functionality. HAND.
*goes looking at his 1000 mediocre versions of Linux kernel, Open Office and Firefox. Or. Not.*