Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jun 2008 22:47 UTC, submitted by Flatland_Spider
Thread beginning with comment 320190
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: It wasn't a rant.
by Soulbender on Fri 27th Jun 2008 04:30
in reply to "RE: It wasn't a rant."
In any large company this would have been considered inappropriate or at least highly unproffessional.
The CEO having legitimate concerns about your product is inappropriate? Seriously? I dont know what large companies you've worked for (probably none) but I'm happy I dont work for those if voicing concerns internally about shortcomings in your product is inappropriate.
Not to mention the reputation damage that is done to Microsoft, especially in the corporate world.
You've never read any internal executive emails, have you? Much, much worse things are said in internal emails every day.




Member since:
2005-12-18
I find it hard to see his email being a rant.
His a concerned executive that is passionate about his products and he wants to suceed. I have my reservations about Microsoft, but in the end Gates is completely right - his experience with Moviemaker, the terrible search functionality arguments are completely funded.
We run Sharepoint which drives significant portions of our intellectual property - and the search functionality sucks!
Check this link out, it describes another famous email by Jim Allchin - a Microsoft executive who was comparing Apple's software by sayingg MS had lost its way while painting Apple in a much better light by saying:
"I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft"
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/110354.asp
Now that's some fighting words.