Now that Java has a fully open sourced implementation in RedHat's IcedTea, Neil McAllister questions whether an open Java even matters: "Even as Java has stretched outward to embrace more concepts and technologies - adding APIs and language features as it goes - newer, more lightweight tools have appeared that do most of what Java aims to do. And they often do it better."
Thread beginning with comment 320304
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2007-07-13
> Additionally, it's currently the only serious free software competitor to .NET
Actually, according to TIOBE:
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
Neither C#.Net nor VB has the pervasiveness of Java (despite what Microsoft marketing would like you to believe). There's a fair bit of VB out there but even Microsoft would consider it 'legacy' for the most part (most new .NET stuff seems to be C#).
Java may not always be the best tool for the job, but it is a tool that can do almost any job. If you only felt like learning one programming language to be your 'swiss army knife' then Java should be the one (and perhaps C as number two for dealing with hardware).
Back on the topic proper. It is great Sun's Java implementation is 100% free/libre. That removes a whole bunch of risk using it in free software projects. I hope that the Free Software movement adopts it for use, instead of clunky and fragile scripted messes, or cobbled together native libraries with wildly diverging design philosophies.