Now that Java has a fully open sourced implementation in RedHat's IcedTea, Neil McAllister questions whether an open Java even matters: "Even as Java has stretched outward to embrace more concepts and technologies - adding APIs and language features as it goes - newer, more lightweight tools have appeared that do most of what Java aims to do. And they often do it better."
Thread beginning with comment 320447
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-03-28
There is several things rudiculous - first is obsession with speed. As for client side, your app is either fast enough, or not, so the obsession for C++ like performance is just funny. The second thing is obsession to run various dynamic languages upon Java. Gee - why? Those are better than Java. Java might be well established, supported, having some APIs, but - as an innovation technology it completly failed to fullfill what it was meant for. Dynamic and scripting languages run circels around Java productivity. So save Java's ass, they came-up with JavaFX declarative aproach. Some ppl finally realised, that all that object stuff might actually pretty much suck.
And before you would try to educate me of the OOP advantages - beeing there, done that.