To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, not according to the review. I haven't tried it yet so I won't say one way or the other, but if it really has no way of removing dead dependencies, I don't know how you can possibly think it is better than apt. Also, even if it could stand a comparison, if your mp3 packages have OpenOffice dependencies it won't do any good.
The thing about apt is that it keeps a log (in my simplistic way of understanding it) of which packages were automatically installed to satisfy dependencies for package A. Thenceforth, it recommends that you remove them if package A is no longer installed. This is not the same as finding "orphan" packages. For example, b43-fwcutter would be listed as an orphan package because as far as I know nothing depends on it. Yet, it may still be needed. Yet, apt would not recommend that it be autoremoved, because it was not automatically installed, but rather explicitly installed.






Member since:
2007-05-05
Not in the latest version -- in openSUSE 11.0 package management literally rocks. It's way more powerful and intelligent than APT, and is quicker since we've switched to LZMA rpm payload.