Linked by David Adams on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 16:11 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Thread beginning with comment 321004
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: You're right KDE 4 doesnt need a fork
by Richard Dale on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 17:35
in reply to "You're right KDE 4 doesnt need a fork"
Thankyou for your kind words. I think what non-contributors to KDE don't realise about kde developers is the high level of skill involved, and the willingness to take risks. So it is very gratifying to receive such high praise from someone who is clearly an expert at spotting innovative software development happening right under their nose.
You are right to point out how silly we are still carrying on with new releases of the KDE 3.x series. I don't know what we can do about those loose cannons on the project who want to keep the old stuff going while working just as hard on those new shiny things.
RE: You're right KDE 4 doesnt need a fork
by TheMonoTone on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 18:21
in reply to "You're right KDE 4 doesnt need a fork"
RE: You're right KDE 4 doesnt need a fork
by _txf_ on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 20:37
in reply to "You're right KDE 4 doesnt need a fork"





Member since:
2005-07-12
KDE 3.5 does. KDE 4 in all, sucks. KDE 4 is the Windows Vista of the Linux world. Do I think KDE 4 will be good enough? yeah at version 4.5. For now, some people are happy with KDE 3.5, support for that will go away sooner than later so yeah a fork of KDE 3.5 will be necessary.