Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sat 5th Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 321573
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm sorry, but it was said. From http://troy-at-kde.livejournal.com/17753.html
No it was not and, the quote you provided does underscore the fact.
"Does KDE even need users?"
If the users are harming the project, we don't need those users. I've hesitated to tell these users to (quoting the recently deceased Carlin) "go outside and play hide and go f--k yourself."
If the users are harming the project, we don't need those users. I've hesitated to tell these users to (quoting the recently deceased Carlin) "go outside and play hide and go f--k yourself."
As you clearly specify users harming the project, thats users having negative contribution. Those are clearly not wanted anywhere. KDE are no exception to that.
So nowhere are users asked to go f--k yourself, only people out to harm the project. Thats a huge and obvious difference.





Member since:
2005-10-13
I'm sorry, but it was said. From http://troy-at-kde.livejournal.com/17753.html
If the users are harming the project, we don't need those users. I've hesitated to tell these users to (quoting the recently deceased Carlin) "go outside and play hide and go f--k yourself."
Edit: To be fair, he mentioned at the top that it was a rant and later apologized for it. But the post spawned a great deal of discussion among other KDE developers, with many agreeing with the position at least to some degree. (And others disagreeing whole heartedly.)
Edited 2008-07-06 08:44 UTC