Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Mon 7th Jul 2008 18:18 UTC, submitted by Dale Smoker
Thread beginning with comment 321814
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by satan666
by Johann Chua on Tue 8th Jul 2008 05:48
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by satan666"
RE[7]: Comment by satan666
by kaiwai on Tue 8th Jul 2008 05:55
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by satan666"
I think they meant that the typical user doesn't need Photoshop to begin with. It's a niche professional application.
Well, if Photoshop is a 'niche professional applications' - there seems to be a very big niche market. The average end user would most likely use Photoshop Elements if anything. With that being said, with the increasing availability of academic software out there, there are a lot of people (rightly or wrongly) who run Photoshop because it can be obtained cheaply.
Photoshop isn't the solution though, and it frustrates me that Linux advocates on here who cant see that it is being used as an example of a lack of mainstream big name desktop software vendors for Linux. As soon as Photoshop is mentioned there is foaming at the mouth and claims of "oh, they don't need that!".





Member since:
2005-07-08
Of Photoshop? The typical user probably does more than I do. The "Typical User" of Photoshop is professionals and not the kind who download it over torrent networks.
Most "typical users" do some pretty heavy things in all the apps I listed. On a daily basis.
The "typical user" line applies to Office, not professional graphics, video or photo workhorses.
(unless of course you're just being sarcastic
Edited 2008-07-07 23:51 UTC