Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Thu 10th Jul 2008 16:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 322357
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
i've aliased rm to essentially "what ???"
so I have to type the full path /bin/rm
and habitually use -iv "always"
......................
the time it takes to type "/bin/rm -iv"
seems to prevent the hurriedly-typing
errors (rm oops I meant cp) which
otherwise could occur.
HAS WORKED for over 3 years great here
.............................





Member since:
2007-02-26
I don't agree with the rm -i alias. I've gotten into the habit of explicitly using mv -i and rm -i (when using wildcards). If a user assumes rm will provide interactive feedback - i.e. because it's aliased that way on a couple systems - s/he may be very surprised when working on a system that does not.