Linked by Adam S on Fri 11th Jul 2008 04:37 UTC, submitted by peskypescado
Internet & Networking A recent post about Firefox and my general view of corporations and organizations has caused a bit of a stir. It even caught the attention of Asa Dotzler. He said "It's really hard for me to believe that either [Microsoft or Adobe] have the free and open Web at heart when they're actively subverting it with closed technologies like Flash and Silverlight." But are they really subverting it? Where exactly is the line between serving the consumer and subverting the web? I think the W3C should share in this blame.
Thread beginning with comment 322513
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Kroc
by ljgshkg on Fri 11th Jul 2008 14:56 UTC in reply to "Comment by Kroc"
ljgshkg
Member since:
2008-03-25

I guess it's OK as long as the tools (plugins) required to run those proprietary components remains free AND we still have good enough web standard technologies allowing us to do rich web sites without those proprietary components (e.g. AJAX).

What we want are choices, and good enough open choices. We don't need everything to be open anyway.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by ljgshkg on Fri 11th Jul 2008 20:30 in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
ljgshkg Member since:
2008-03-25

If someone -1 my message, may be you should at least leave a short message. -1-ing me without saying anything'd just keep me wondering what exactly you're opposing...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1