Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Fri 11th Jul 2008 22:30 UTC, submitted by pas de calais
Linux "Recently a blog post entitled 'Why Desktop Linux is its own worst enemy' has come across my feed-radar a few times. It's yet another in the long line of 'Linux ain't ready yet' jeremiads and it doesn't really say anything new yet it got on my nerves. Why?" Ryan Cartwright at Freesoftware Magazine is on fine form with this wonderfully splenetic broadside. Read the full tirade at FSM.
Thread beginning with comment 322649
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Good Lord
by kaiwai on Sat 12th Jul 2008 17:04 UTC in reply to "RE: Good Lord"
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

I recently got into a big discussion with a friend of mine I convinced to buy a macbook pro. He really loves both OSX and his laptop, but he is always complaining about the lack of free software on the platform, and talks about that as this big weakness.

So I brought my laptop over with a hacked OSX partition (i have an iMac at home in the living room that is frequently used, just couldn't justify the cost to performance for a macbook myself), and showed him all the phenomenal apps I use regularly that are far beyond equivalents on any other platform (dragthing, transmit, textmate, etc). It was like opening his eyes to a whole new world, sure, these things are 15-20$ each, but thats the price of eating out for lunch, or going to a movie.

It boggles my mind when linux fans rave about app quality on linux.


He is right, there are limited numbers of free applications - but the free applications that do exist are quality. Adium X, a gorgeous application which exploits the power of opensource whilst at the same time, ensuring that the application fits into the whole Mac OS X experience.

The applications that are available are small in price (as you mentioned) - I mean, lets be honest, iWorks can be picked up for under $100; Office 2008 can be picked up for $200 and can be installed on three computers. There are numerous little applications for $15-$20.

People rant about how great Linux software is, and yet ignore the amount of abandonware out there; imagine you're using an application and find yourself high and dry because the developer has lost inspiration - you're screwed as an end user. Inkscape is practically a zombie in terms of development - appears to have life, but not much happening. Passepartout, another dead application that never livd up to the hype. Pan, great Usenet, too bad it was abandoned.

The list goes on and on. Free and opensource software is useless without someone to maintain and develop it. I'd sooner pay for software and get it developed than being left high and dry because someone has lost their drive to develop.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Good Lord
by ishmal on Mon 14th Jul 2008 21:02 in reply to "RE[2]: Good Lord"
ishmal Member since:
2005-11-11

Inkscape is practically a zombie in terms of development - appears to have life, but not much happening.


I was surprised when I saw this line. Maybe you mean some other similar project? I can assure that Inkscape is VERY busy, and is one of the more active projects on Sourceforge. It has many contributors, and is currently one of the fortunate participants in GSoC. Right now, it is going through huge changes, now that the big change from its internal rendering library to Cairo has finally started.

Possibly it only seems quiet now that it has begun using Launchpad for issue tracking rather than SF.net.

Reply Parent Score: 2